<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NUFC Statement.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:09:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: workyticket</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>workyticket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>bowburnmag says: 
August 24, 2009 at 11:14 pm

&quot;I’m tired and probably starting to lose the debate!&quot;

No, you&#039;re getting much, much better, and as I said to Hugh, I&#039;m not arguing and I don&#039;t necessarily have a completely opposed view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bowburnmag says:<br />
August 24, 2009 at 11:14 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m tired and probably starting to lose the debate!&#8221;</p>
<p>No, you&#8217;re getting much, much better, and as I said to Hugh, I&#8217;m not arguing and I don&#8217;t necessarily have a completely opposed view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh de Payen</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh de Payen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4740</guid>
		<description>Well if we want to test our reasoning we ought to be placing everything within a foundation of formal logic, which is tedious but it&#039;s the only real way to establish whether reasoning is well-formed or not.

Otherwise any conclusions about reasoning are merely subjective.

We can&#039;t always establish the truth or falsity of a conclusion but there are prescribed ways to establish whether or not the reasoning that leads to that conclusion is sound.

Why am I talking about logic on a Newcastle United blog at 11:30PM? I really must need some sleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if we want to test our reasoning we ought to be placing everything within a foundation of formal logic, which is tedious but it&#8217;s the only real way to establish whether reasoning is well-formed or not.</p>
<p>Otherwise any conclusions about reasoning are merely subjective.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t always establish the truth or falsity of a conclusion but there are prescribed ways to establish whether or not the reasoning that leads to that conclusion is sound.</p>
<p>Why am I talking about logic on a Newcastle United blog at 11:30PM? I really must need some sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workyticket</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>workyticket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>Hugh de Payen says: 
August 24, 2009 at 11:13 pm 

&quot;Worky, I think you and I, whilst obviously not in agreement, are coming at things from different angles too, which confuses matters even more (mine being the correct angle obviously  ).&quot;

Hugh, you don&#039;t seem to realise that I&#039;m not arguing with you, I am merely testing the foundations of your reasoning. It&#039;s the same with Bowburn too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh de Payen says:<br />
August 24, 2009 at 11:13 pm </p>
<p>&#8220;Worky, I think you and I, whilst obviously not in agreement, are coming at things from different angles too, which confuses matters even more (mine being the correct angle obviously  ).&#8221;</p>
<p>Hugh, you don&#8217;t seem to realise that I&#8217;m not arguing with you, I am merely testing the foundations of your reasoning. It&#8217;s the same with Bowburn too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workyticket</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4733</link>
		<dc:creator>workyticket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4733</guid>
		<description>bowburnmag says: 
August 24, 2009 at 10:44 pm

&quot;I dislike Wise and found it difficult to prevent that clouding my judgement. But I never really had a problem with him being part of it even though he’s not my favourite person. I don’t think it’s clear what the roles were but then that’s an assumption. Based on that I wouldn’t blame Wise but Ashley for not getting the roles and the mix right.&quot;

Bowburn, if you&#039;re judgement isn&#039;t clouded about Dennis Wise, then why did you mention you wouldn&#039;t blame Wise or Ashley, and yet you didn&#039;t mention Keegan as part of the threesome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bowburnmag says:<br />
August 24, 2009 at 10:44 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;I dislike Wise and found it difficult to prevent that clouding my judgement. But I never really had a problem with him being part of it even though he’s not my favourite person. I don’t think it’s clear what the roles were but then that’s an assumption. Based on that I wouldn’t blame Wise but Ashley for not getting the roles and the mix right.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bowburn, if you&#8217;re judgement isn&#8217;t clouded about Dennis Wise, then why did you mention you wouldn&#8217;t blame Wise or Ashley, and yet you didn&#8217;t mention Keegan as part of the threesome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowburnmag</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>bowburnmag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>Partly, he seems to have too much say without understanding the industry. Also I just felt like Wise wasn&#039;t utilised properly. Money is good but he&#039;s a training ground and round the games kinda guy. In fairness, I possibly never properly understood the role of Vitere and the other guy who&#039;s name escapes me. I just felt like the club hasn&#039;t been able to do the simple things. Not sending reps to charity do&#039;s, double-booking on Sir Bobby&#039;s exhibition game. I&#039;m tired and probably starting to lose the debate! I&#039;m off to kip shortly! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partly, he seems to have too much say without understanding the industry. Also I just felt like Wise wasn&#8217;t utilised properly. Money is good but he&#8217;s a training ground and round the games kinda guy. In fairness, I possibly never properly understood the role of Vitere and the other guy who&#8217;s name escapes me. I just felt like the club hasn&#8217;t been able to do the simple things. Not sending reps to charity do&#8217;s, double-booking on Sir Bobby&#8217;s exhibition game. I&#8217;m tired and probably starting to lose the debate! I&#8217;m off to kip shortly! <img src='http://www.nufcblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh de Payen</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh de Payen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>Worky, I think you and I, whilst obviously not in agreement, are coming at things from different angles too, which confuses matters even more (mine being the correct angle obviously ;) ).

Anyway, I&#039;m knackered and off to bed (and I&#039;ll be having some sharp words with the dog on the way!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worky, I think you and I, whilst obviously not in agreement, are coming at things from different angles too, which confuses matters even more (mine being the correct angle obviously <img src='http://www.nufcblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m knackered and off to bed (and I&#8217;ll be having some sharp words with the dog on the way!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workyticket</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4730</link>
		<dc:creator>workyticket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4730</guid>
		<description>bowburnmag says: 
August 24, 2009 at 10:44 pm 

On the board, I meant we needed football men on the board. 
 
Bowburn, Richard Money is a football man, Jeff Vetere is a football man, Dennis Wise is a football man. Did you just mean Llambias?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bowburnmag says:<br />
August 24, 2009 at 10:44 pm </p>
<p>On the board, I meant we needed football men on the board. </p>
<p>Bowburn, Richard Money is a football man, Jeff Vetere is a football man, Dennis Wise is a football man. Did you just mean Llambias?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowburnmag</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>bowburnmag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>On the board, I meant we needed football men on the board. I like and respect Hughton. Calderwood slightly less so. I dislike Wise and found it difficult to prevent that clouding my judgement. But I never really had a problem with him being part of it even though he&#039;s not my favourite person. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s clear what the roles were but then that&#039;s an assumption. Based on that I wouldn&#039;t blame Wise but Ashley for not getting the roles and the mix right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the board, I meant we needed football men on the board. I like and respect Hughton. Calderwood slightly less so. I dislike Wise and found it difficult to prevent that clouding my judgement. But I never really had a problem with him being part of it even though he&#8217;s not my favourite person. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s clear what the roles were but then that&#8217;s an assumption. Based on that I wouldn&#8217;t blame Wise but Ashley for not getting the roles and the mix right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh de Payen</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh de Payen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workyticket</title>
		<link>http://www.nufcblog.org/2009/08/nufc-statement-2/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>workyticket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nufcblog.org/?p=3530#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>Hugh de Payen says: 
August 24, 2009 at 10:12 pm

&quot;Let’s say your web host screws up and we lose the blog for a while. Sure they deserve some criticism but do you think that people will give a stuff who you lay the blame on?&quot;

If this website were a large financial concern, and I lost a large amount of money though my webhosts taking my money and not fulfilling their contract, then I would get one of my lawyers to sue them and let the court decide whose fault it was. Simple!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh de Payen says:<br />
August 24, 2009 at 10:12 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;Let’s say your web host screws up and we lose the blog for a while. Sure they deserve some criticism but do you think that people will give a stuff who you lay the blame on?&#8221;</p>
<p>If this website were a large financial concern, and I lost a large amount of money though my webhosts taking my money and not fulfilling their contract, then I would get one of my lawyers to sue them and let the court decide whose fault it was. Simple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
