Tino, did you even read the first line of this article?

workyticket says:
October 3, 2009 at 12:45 am

That’s the wrong one Tino. The one the Daily Mail posted was only from seven months ago. Read the story more closely.

———————————————–

Oops, i’ll get my coat!

………

Load of rubbish.

Pointing to the failings of managers while we were a PLC as reasons for it not working is like pointing to us under Allardyce, Keegan the second time or Kinnear as reasons for not being a PLC as being a problem.

Keegan walked out on us as a PLC because he didn’t want us to go down that road but he was proven wrong to do so IMO, plenty of money available for transfers under the next few managers that followed that he would have had if he had stayed.

You’re wrong about Man City too by the way, he said he was leaving the following Summer but he left over a year earlier.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/low/football/teams/m/man_city/4338665.stm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-340956/Keegan-quits-again.html

“Sorry Worky but someone beat you to it!”

That’s the wrong one Tino. The one the Daily Mail posted was only from seven months ago. Read the story more closely.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1217756/Is-YouTube-clip-Newcastle-used-buy-Ignacio-Gonzalez-anger-Kevin-Keegan.html?ITO=1490

Yes, he quit the toon the first time, but that was down to the fact the club was going to be floated on the market and become a Plc, a system which keegan totally disagreed with as he didn’t think it’s how a club should be run. I guess he had a point, as aside from a few years of prosperity under Sir Bobby, the club didn’t exactly go on in leaps and bounds after the flotation, did it?

At Fulham, he left because he felt he needed to focus on the england job full time (he worked both jobs for a few months simultaneously). Hardly call that walking out and quitting, would you?

England, yes he quit, but surely it’s the mark of a man who can hold his hands up and admit he just wasn’t good enough? Can’t question his integrity there.

Next up, Man city, his contract was expiring and he told the chairman that he intended to retire from football in the summer. Despite the fact that the club were doing pretty well under him in the league at the time, the chairman suggested Keegan leave in march, rather than wait until the end of the season, to allow his successor some time to work with the team, rather than starting afresh in preseason.

And lastly, us again, where yes, he did quit, but i think that today’s ruling has made it pretty bloody clear why he did it, and let’s face it, he was completely justified in doing so.

When you actually look at the facts of the man’s managerial career, you can see that he isn’t the serial quitter the media portray him to be, and up until last season he hadn’t exactly ever left a club in the lurch when he departed.

So, the moral of the story would appear to be; “Stop regurgitating the spiteful bullshit the tabloids feed you every day, muppets.”

Got tickets for Leazes Corner tommora! Lets make some noise!

“I find I keep getting trapped in YouTube. I went from Nacho to Ranger to Vuckic and then, unaccountably, to Jessica Alba, just by following interesting looking ‘related links’.

It’s easy to waste time on that site.”

I find that Google’s even better for wasting time, Hugh, then you can get them from everywhere. Original Punk, Johan Cruyff and Garrincha are my main vices usually.

That being said, I am truly disgusted that a man who says he loves the club would go on and sue them for £25M. That is completely out of proportion. If I was a member of the Tribunal, I would have ruled in favour of Keegan, but only sanctioned a nominal fee in compensation. After all, it was the second time he just walked out on Newcastle, as he has from virtually every job he has had.

I love Keegan the manager, but I’m not so sure about Keegan the man.